Friday, March 16, 2018

Korean beauty versus Japanese beauty - revisited

I wasn’t going to take part in the grand Japanese beauty versus Korean beauty debacle of 2018, because how much more can you beat this very dead horse?

To any thinking person with even the most basic reading and comprehension skills, it’s obvious that the whole thing started as a PR stunt to promote some non-name quasi-Japanese brand. Yet, K-beauty cheerleaders jumped on the cause with the zeal of religious converts and burning with righteous anger tried to convince the masses that K-beauty is great (some of it is), that it’s been around for as long as J-beauty (nope, no matter how you slice it, not true) and that the future belongs to skincare innovations coming from Seoul, not Tokyo (probably because they can’t read Japanese studies or press releases).

Now, let’s get a few things straight. I am a fan of K-beauty. Well, of some of it. There are great products made in Korea, that much is true. Just as there are great products made in France, or made in the US. Or made in Japan. But there is just as much junk made in those countries. No one place holds the answer to the eternal quest for the fountain of youth (apart, perhaps, from your plastic surgeon's office).

Yet despite being a fan of high quality K-beauty products, I prefer to use Japanese skincare. Why? Convenience. I live in Japan. It makes sense that I would use what is easily available. Having said that, I am all about equal opportunity when it comes to bitching. And that brings us to the sheer stupidity of the entire K-beauty versus J-beauty issue. So let's bitch a little.

If you have been living under a rock in a galaxy far, far away, this is the CliffsNotes version.

  • K-beauty = all trendy fluff and cute packaging, form over substance.
  • J-beauty = time honored ancient rituals and simplicity.
K-beauty blogebrities and assorted fangirls jumped to defend Korean skincare and cosmetic products, sometimes talking utter nonsense, because apparently googling dates and historical facts in a language you don’t understand is too much effort.

But, let's start at the start.

And it all started back in 2017 with this article in Cosmetics Business - link, which was clearly intended to promote certain brands in a quasi-objective manner.
That in turn led to two different stories.

One in Vogue UK produced this quote:
“K-Beauty is all about the razzmatazz - Instagrammable products and routines, extremes like 10-step regimes, glass skin… All with cute and clever packaging, backed up by serious formulations. In contrast, the Japanese approach to beauty is more about tradition, a quiet seriousness, understated luxury and played down presentation reinforced by a long heritage in beauty.” says Anna-Marie Solowij, a BeautyMart co-founder.

And all hell broke loose.

Anna-Marie Solowij apparently used to be an actual award-winning beauty journalist with over 25 years experience, even becoming the beauty director of British Vogue. Which only proves that you can make money doing something you are only vaguely familiar with. (This is going to become a trend, keep reading!)

These days she runs something called BeautyMART, which is supposed to be “a unique place to learn more about beauty, get insider advice and top tips from us and our industry insider friends, as well as a place to shop for innovative beauty products.” 

This is a woman who actually thinks that Fairydrops mascara is a hit in Japan. Newsflash, it’s not. Apart from Fairydrops, her knowledge of Japanese beauty seems to be limited to several DHC products and Daiso exfoliating towels.

Here’s the selection of what this expert thinks is the best of Japanese beauty - link.



Yes, try not to laugh too hard.

Around the same time, another clearly sponsored piece appeared, this one in The South China Morning Post - link, by one Funmi Fetto, who clearly believes every piece of PR that lands on her desk. But you’d expect nothing less from a Vogue UK contributing beauty editor, right? Do you see a pattern here? Is Vogue UK the hotbed of stupid? It seems so.

In The South China Morning Post article Ms. Fetto goes on a drivel spree showing just how little she knows about Asian beauty markets, trends and products. But clearly that small fact was not going to stop her from writing a story about it. This seems to be a common pattern among beauty editors, doesn’t it?

And while we're on the topic of Fairydrops - 
Dear Funmi, Fairydrops mascara is not, and never has been, a best seller in Japan. It’s actually quite mediocre. There are better choices. 
In case you’re not aware (and from your work I see that indeed you’re not), there’s something called @cosme in Japan. They do twice yearly rankings of best products. Wow! Can you believe that? Actual rankings by actual Japanese people! Magic! 
Next time you get a PR blurb, go and check how it compares with the listings of the most popular beauty products in Japan. Here you have the best mascaras of 2017. You’re welcome! xoxo :-)

Those two stories provoked a riposte in Beautytap (formerly known as W2Beauty) where the columnist does her best to prove that K-beauty has been around for centuries, in the process confusing traditional beauty practices and the establishment of actual commercial production. But history… so hard…

And that should have been the end of it. Yet, instead of fizzling into oblivion, this imaginary K-beauty versus J-beauty feud lives on. A new crop of articles about the superiority of Japanese beauty keeps appearing every few days. That's in part thanks to Victoria Tsai, the CEO of Tatcha, who smelled a chance to get her face in the news again and promote her brand.


Our favorite Chinese-American who owns a company headquartered in San Francisco that makes beauty products that are not even sold in Japan, seeing a great PR opportunity, sprung into action. I guess Tatcha’s sales must be really down, since Ms. Tsai is so desperately whoring for attention these days.

Apart from this “Japanese brand based on the beauty secrets of geisha”, the other name repeatedly pushed in these PR pieces (because let’s not kid ourselves, that is what all these fluffs with affiliate links are) is Adsorb.



Adsorb, made by Zeal Cosmetics is a brand that started in 2011 (OMG, it's not ancient and time-honored! Go and commit sudoku NOW!) and which is apparently all the rage in Japan, while being sold only via salons and professional beauty clinics.
Translation - nobody on the street really heard about it. The very limited number of reviews on @Cosme only confirms that.
But I digress.

However, in the most recent piece defending the virtues of Japanese beauty products, two new talking heads appeared: the founder of Surratt Beauty and the esteemed Frances Grant, the senior vice president of marketing for Shiseido America.

The utter nonsense they spewed in this Fashionista piece was what finally convinced me to speak up.

Everybody knows that Ms. Tsai will say whatever bullshit she can to plug Tatcha’s magical connections to ancient Japan. Because geishas and kabukis and sacred rituals and time-honored traditions… All of it is pure, undiluted, piled higher and deeper marketing BS. And anyone who believes in magical Japanese rituals is a gullible idiot who deserves the overpriced mediocrity that is Tatcha.

For the same money you can have Sulwhasoo, people...




The entry of Troy Surratt, the founder of Surratt Beauty, into the game of "let's defend J-beauty" peaked my interest. Once upon a time I even considered ordering some of his products, but eventually decided against it. I can go to any department store locally and buy better stuff for less money.

I know Mr. Surratt thought it would be a good opportunity to promote his brand, and he is trying, bless his heart.
But saying things like:
"While so many of the Korean products were whimsical and appealing in their cheekiness and playfulness, I think that globally we're taking on a more serious tone — people are looking for substance and integrity,” 
just shows how uninformed he is about K-beauty.


Mr. Surratt should stick to applying makeup, because apparently that is the only thing he is good at. It’s clear that he is only familiar with the packaging of low end Korean mass market products intended for teens and compares them with high end Japanese cosmetics. The key word here being - packaging.


Versus:



That actually seems to be the main issue in this whole debacle. The original K-beauty vs J-beauty story did exactly the same - compared flashy Korean packaging to selected boring-looking Japanese products.


Mr. Surratt also says that,
“The Japanese are so honorable as a culture that if they are making a skin-care claim, they have the research to back it up. They would never make a claim that was dishonest or too lofty.” 
Poor child, in his pursuit of quality, he apparently never visited a normal Japanese drugstore and looked at normal drugstore products. Or, he simply is an idiot. Otherwise he would have known that just as anywhere else in the world, Japanese drugstores are full of products with too lofty claims. That's what advertising and marketing people get paid for, right?


This type of clickbaity nonsense can be expected from a no-name wannabe beauty journalist, or even a former Vogue UK beauty editor, apparently. Or even a makeup weeabo like Mr. Surratt. This level of ignorance seems to go with the territory. But when a beauty professional echoes similar sentiments, then you just start laughing.


Enter Ms. Frances Grant, who is the senior vice president of marketing for Shiseido America. Judging by what Ms. Grant says about K-beauty and J-beauty, it’s clear that Shiseido will hire just about anyone these days.


She said,
“In comparison to Korean beauty, which is known for its fun packaging and of-the-moment formulas and colors, J-Beauty is centered around quality manufacturing, understated opulence, and groundbreaking science and technology.”

Yes, this quote came from someone who is an "expert" in the industry. I told you that "dumb things beauty pros say" was going to be a trend, didn't I?

Ms. Grant, you're clearly in over your head here and have zero clue what you’re talking about.

Are you even aware that one of the sub-brands from your company, Shiseido’s own Majolica Majorca, is the drugstore leader in Japanese “fun packaging and of-the-moment formulas and colors?” Or that Shiseido’s Maquillage line is a serious contender for the "cheap plastic gaudiness and trailer park glam" award?
I guess not.


And isn't Ettusais a Shiseido brand as well?


Well, wouldn't you know it! It is!

Not only doesn't Ms. Grant know what the Japanese branch of her company produces, it also must have been a while since she visited a Japanese drugstore, otherwise she would have noticed brands like Canmake and Sweets Sweets that are doing their best to outdo Korea in the cuteness department.



She also seems unfamiliar with such Japanese beauty staples like Jill Stuart, Anna Sui and Les Merveilleuses LADURÉE, which would give any Korean brand a run for its money in the fun and spur of the moment anything. Understated opulence my ass.



In short, Ms. Grant, as the American VP of marketing for Shiseido, a leading Japanese beauty company and one of the oldest beauty companies in the world, clearly doesn’t know all that much about what Japanese cosmetics actually look like these days.



There you have it, folks. Sad, but true pitfalls of reducing one country's entire beauty industry to little more than packaging.

There's an ancient Japanese saying, full of time-honored Asian wisdom, passed down from one generation of geisha to the next, whispered in hushed voiced while practicing sacred beauty rituals and sipping green tea infused with the spirit of wabisabi.

It goes something like this.

Don't judge a face cream by its jar. Its beautiful jar.




Images without watermarks: companies' respective websites




11 comments:

  1. Is it a Christmas already? 2 blog-posts in a few days? – it should be... By the way, thank you for sawing my money that I wrongly intended to spend on Surratt cosmetics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mam okolo 20 wpisow ktore siedza w "draft" ;-)

      A odnosnie Surratt Beauty, to jak powiedziala komentatorka pod toba, kup Visee Avant. To surrattowy dupe, a za kase, ktora zaoszczedzilas zafunduj sobie nowa pare butow.

      Delete
  2. I have purchased several surratt eyeshadow, brushes and one blush (during sephora's holiday 25 off 50 coupons for past three years). I really like them at that discount price haha, compared to Japanese eyeshadow they are same level as visee avant singles (800yens) and anna sui (12bucks) but generally I think the color range from visee is edgier.

    The brushes are good for what's available in US but I find a 50 dollars eyeshadow brush is comparable to a 3000yen one from lunasol (I bet they are made in same chikuhodo factory). It's funny that makeup/markep guru are defending j-beauty like that when they are not offering the better ones of what's available (or not)in Japan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi!
      You're absolutely right.
      I've always thought of Surratt as a clone of Addiction by Ayako.
      But you are right, it's pretty much Visee Avant. Which actually makes sense, since both Addiction and Visee are Kose brands.

      And as for brushes, I haven't found one that I really liked yet. In any price range. From any brand.

      When they invent a self-cleaning brush, ultrasonic brush, I'll be in heaven.
      Elon Musk should get on it!

      Delete
  3. Love this post ^.^

    I too have a preference for J-beauty, but like you it stemmed from convenience and availability as my husband and I had lived in Japan a few times. It's both of our pet-peeve when people say sh*ts like ancient China has 5,000 years of culture and history (history is truly hard for some folks), Japan is all about the aesthetics and the rituals (generalization much?), and Korea is all about the pop-culture and trends (blanket statement much?) blah blah blah I just can't even... >.<"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Precisely! Generalizations! When beauty journos make them, I can live with that. They're not the smartest, and besides, generalizations sell, that's what most consumers can relate to.

      But when people in the actual industry make them, then it's a problem. They have the opportunity to set the record straight, but instead they feed into the general bullshit and propaganda. Either intentionally, or out of sheer ignorance.

      Delete
    2. and omg BeautyMart's "Best of Japanese Beauty" made me spit water out of my mouth xD may be DHC's paying her is my best guess...

      Delete
  4. The founders of BeautyMART just prove relations are all you need in the industry. I don’t know how she can be an award winning journalist, must have been before Google. If you see some of their other comments, or just the selection from their store, you’ll see they seriously lack knowledge on anything beauty. When they originally started jumping on the Korean beauty bandwagon, on their Instagram they thought DHC was Korean. Great someone pointed out otherwise, so they could actually compile the Best of Japanese piece...

    ReplyDelete
  5. “Plastic surgeon?” Surely you mean “cosmetic surgeon”. Time to learn the differences.
    Cheers.
    Annaliesa Jordan, M.D.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surely I meant "plastic".
      If I have to explain a joke, then it's no longer funny.
      And if you'd spent more than 5 seconds on this blog reading other posts instead of being a butthurt M.D., then you would have known that where it matters I refer to the profession by its proper name.
      Cheers!

      Delete
  6. Wow, absolute demystification of the entire bandwagon trends... Somehow I stumbled upon your blog while trying to understand why I should spend my hard earned cash on Tatcha and voila! I got here.

    I'am so impressed about your analysis, and let's just say, I would stick to my F (french) beauty in the man time with utmost attention to where my cash wanders to.

    On the other hand, would you advice that the adsorb brand by Zeal be a great brand to try vs. Tatcha? Am eager to try some high quality J Beauty products.

    Thanks in advance.

    ReplyDelete

Anonymous and/ or unsigned comments will be deleted. No exceptions. All comments are moderated and will appear after approval.

Anonimowe komentarze bez podpisow beda ignorowane. Bez wyjatkow. Komentarze sa moderowane.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...